Expose Realtors ~ Email me Your Story

NAR is NOT listening, State Realtor Associations is NOT Listening,
Law Makers - Attorneys - Judges are Not Listening..
State Real Estate Boards Are NOT Listening...

Title Companies, Lawyers, Good Realtors ...
Can DO Nothing.. so Email ME
Crystal L. Cox Real Estate Whistleblower
and Get your Story Heard...
Expose Realtors on our
Real Estate Industry Whistleblower...
Tell your Story...

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

NAR - the Ultimate Wolf in Sheeps Clothing

NAR - the Ultimate Wolf in Sheeps Clothing
Time to Hold NAR Accountable
to Those Code of Ethics
that are Simply Gibberish
they make Newbies Swear to
But have No Intention
or System in Place to
Make this REALLY Happen.

Time For the Truth About
the National Association of Realtors.

the National Association of Realtors is a Hoax.

NAR is NOT of a "Higher Standard" as they Claim to Be.

NAR does not Provide Consumer Protection in ANY way.

The National Association of Realtors NEEDS

you to REALLY buy into the Illusion that they
are the "Voice of Real Estate"
that way you will Simply not know that you can use
a Real Estate Broker that is NOT Part of the
Real Estate Cartel known as
National Association of Realtors.

And You Believe that an NAR Member Offers you
More Protection in your Real Estate Transaction
When In Fact that is a Flat Out Lie.

NAR is so Engrained in your Life that ALL of you Use
the Word "Realtor" for the WordS "Real Estate Agent"
though NAR tells me that is Illegal. Law Books Do it, you Do it
But NAR wants to STOP me from Doing it.

The National Association of Realtors
Violates Anti-Trust Laws, Violates Mortgage Laws,
Violates RESPA Laws, they pay Attorneys to
Advise members at the State Association Level
that is Information Biased on What NAR Needs
to be the Course of Action, to Keep NAR in Business.

Even to the Point of Convincing Members they
are doing something Illegal when they try and
benefit the Real Estate Consumer.

NAR Pushes State Real Estate Governing Agencies
to Make E and O insurance Mandated -
when in FACT this E and O insurance is What Enables
the Realtor to Legally Committ Fraud and
there is nothing you Can do unless you have
BIG Money and a WHOLE lot of Years to Fight.

The National Association of Realtor IS NOT the
Voice Of Real Estate. NO WAY.


Shaun Donovan - SHOCKER - the Realtors "Strongly Support" ...

Should a Realtor be the Head of HUD.. this is a VERY Scary Affiliation?

NAR has noted that a proven leader is critical for HUD during these troubled times in the nation's housing market and to ensure the current deteriorating environment is not repeated. "Shaun Donovan is an acknowledged expert in housing with a record of solving challenges at HUD and the New York City Department of Housing, Preservation and Development," McMillan said. "In addition, his hands-on experience in the private and nonprofit sectors will be extremely helpful."

"NAR stands ready to work with Secretary-Designate Donovan to restore confidence in the housing market and rebuild the American dream of homeownership," said McMillan. .. Again Shocking .... the News NAR president glad to work with a Realtor to Fix the Housing Situation that in my Opinion the Realtors are a HUGE part to Blame.

Full Article Click Below
r
r
the Realtor motto is "The Voice for Real Estate" - in No Way SHOULD the Association of Realtors be "The Voice for Real Estate" - Who Will Stop the Realtor from What they are Really Doing to the Real Estate Consumer?

Read more...

Frivolous Lawsuits - Article from Anchorage Board of Realtors..


They’re costly, usually
unexpected… and they
silently threaten your career.
r
Now Alaska REALTORS® are leading an
effort to ensure frivolous lawsuits target the person
who tries to target you.
r
The long term goal is to pass a law in Alaska
that would protect victims of frivolous lawsuits by
monetarily penalizing the loser.
r
It would be modeled after Colorado legislation which requires
a Judge to determine if a lawsuit filed is frivolous.
r
If so, the plaintiff is ordered to pay the defendant
double the cost of litigation. That means the
attorney who filed the lawsuit could have to pay
damages. The idea is to prevent attorneys from
pursuing lawsuits without basis.
r
The Alaska Association of REALTORS®
Industry Issues Committee met last week to create
a local action plan to gather local support from
other business owners and industries that are also
commonly hit with frivolous lawsuits. Among
them, homebuilders, medical providers and
attorneys.
The Committee hopes to see an Alaska bill
introduced next session in the House Labor &
Commerce Committee that would also require the
loser to pay double the cost of the suit.
r
Link to Source
r
They Call it Frivolous Lawsuits, I as an Ex-Realtor who has seen the "system" in action, I Call it Your Life. When a Real Estate Consumer Attempts to Sue a Realtor, andof courses LOSES, the Realtors and All their Political Clout, they get mad and they rise up in large, well funded groups and Legislative to Take your Power to Hold Realtors accountable away from you for GOOD. The Realtors, at ALL costs MUST defend their Right to Lie, their Right to Fail To Disclose, and their right to ruin your life. Claims against Realtors are most often TRUE... and Protecting the REAL Victim in the Real Estate Transaction is NOT what the Goal of the Association of Relators is or EVER really has been.
rr
the Person "they" speak of that is "targeting the Realtor" is the Homeowner who has lost everything because a Realtor did not tell them know problems with a house, it is the person whose son has cancer from Mold that a Realtor knew about, it is the person who was almost killed by a collapsing beam because of Non-Disclosure, the person who has dry ponds in their yard because the Realtor lied about water rights, the person who has to take a bedroom because of the lies of a Septic Size, the Person who pays $20,000 to fix a Radiant heating system when the Realtor knew how bad it was and did not disclose, the person who loses sleep - hundreds of thousands of dollars - equity - time and endures ENORMOUS amounts of Stress because of a Realtor who FLAT out Lied to them and is in NO Way Accountable.
r
the Person they Speak of is the Victim ...
r
And that is Who the Realtors Want to Make Sure that they can no longer "silently threaten". Penalizing the LOSER, the Loser is the Real Estate Consumer and they have Suffered ENOUGH at the Hands of the Realtors....
r
"
the plaintiff is ordered to pay the defendant
double the cost of litigation"
So when you Lose and YOU certainly Will
because the Realtors have E and O insurance
and this REALTOR insurance will keep you
in court longer then you can possibly stand...
r
This Will Smack the Wrists and the Pocket Books of
the Real Estate Consumer and make Sure they Do
Not EVER try and Make a Realtor accountable for
their action AGAIN.
r
And to Make Matters Worse they threaten Attorneys..
Hey, if you stand with the Consumer, the Victim,
You Will LOSE and with that Loss
you Will Pay Damages
r
Thereby Discouraging the Real Estate Attorneys
from even thinking about taking a case
against a REALTOR, a member of the
National Association of Realtors..
r
A bit Like a Cartel .. Don't Ya Think...
r
Do Judges have bias when a Realtor is Involved?
r
I don't Know, but hey, Realtors Have More Money
than the Real Estate Consumer, Better Attorneys,
and with their numbers they Sure Can make alot
more Noise then the Real Estate Consumer.
r
Think About this Stuff Folks...
rr
I Just want You to Consider this Stuff.
I am NOT asking you to Believe Me,
I am Simply Exposing Situations for you to
Learn More, to Ponder to Think About...
r

Read more...

Coldwell Banker Will NOT Stand for Natural Disasters and Independent Brokerages


Lawsuit seeks fees from former New Orleans franchise

Coldwell Banker Real Estate Corp. is suing a former New Orleans franchise to collect
$818,500 the company claims it is owed for past dues and future fees. The former
franchise cancelled its relationship with Coldwell Banker after Hurricane Katrina flooded
its offices and now operates as Danette O'Neal Realtors Inc.

Danette O'Neal, a longtime New Orleans real estate broker who had signed the franchise
agreements with Coldwell Banker in 2004, is fighting back with public criticism of the
lawsuit.

"I understand business, but all of America knows of our plight in New Orleans. The
actions that they have taken threaten not only my business, but my home, personal
possessions and the future of my children," O'Neal stated in a news announcement this
month that was published at several Web sites. "I just want to rebuild my company. I am still trying to restore my company … but instead I must fight Coldwell Banker's threat to take away my legacy to collect 10 years of potential income."

O'Neal -- a prominent African-American businesswoman who was appointed by Louisiana's governor in January 2005 to serve as a commissioner for the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency and leads that group's Single-Family Committee -- has reached out to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the National Black Chamber of Commerce, among other groups and individuals, about the lawsuit.

A spokesman for Coldwell Banker Real Estate Corp. said the lawsuit is focused on O'Neal's misuse of the Coldwell Banker corporate trademarks after she severed ties with the corporation.


Trademarks - Drama - Realtor Ethics - Politics JUST a tiny few of the things that get in the way of actually working for and Protecting the Real Estate Consumer.

Read more...

Have You Been Harmed Financially - Physically - or Emotionally by a Realtor

Have You or Anyone you Know Have Ever Know been Hurt Financially, Had an Injury and an Illness Related to the Lies of Your Realtor?

Has a Realtor failed to disclose to you and it cost you years of your life to pay for a very small portion of the damage?

Has a Realtor Forced you to Stay in Your Contract with them though they were NOT doing the job they promised they would do?


Has a Realtor Charged you too much money for VERY little work?

Email Us your story at Crystal@SavvyBroker.com and we will Post your Bad Realtor Experience Here. Or we will give you access to write on this blog and tell your Story. We want to Expose the actions of the Realtors that is Hurting the Real Estate consumer. You can Post Videos, Documents, or whatever you like to Tell on Your Realtor.

If your Realtor failed to disclose a Known Fact about a property you bought, let us know.

If your Realtor Flat Out Lied to You.. let's tell the World. We are Your Real Estate Consumer Advocate.

If your Realtor Lied to You, tell us your story, if you have it in Writing Send it on Over.. Crystal@CrystalCox.com - if you have a Video send us a link or the Video.. if a Realtor has Hurt YOU.. We Want to KNOW... We WILL get your Story Heard, we have a VERY large Real Estate Marketing Network and We Will Get Your Realtor Sucks story heard ... We are Your Consumer Advocate in Real Estate.

Read more...

Report: Brock Realtors

Brock Realtors unprofessional, lying, manipulative, crooks. I had been with Brock Realtors for 5 years. The property manager Karen is a unprofessional business partner by rude comments and her father, the owner, is a swindler. Ripoff Fort Worth Texas.

Had been a tenant for 5 years, the property manager had alwyas been cooperative and very helpful. Dont know if she hit menopause or what but became rude and disrespectful to me and my business partners. I was then introduced to her father who had a home for sale that he had owned for 20+years and he was so nice and helpful then when the big problems starting arising with the property like no working bathrooms , the windows dont close all the way, rotting floor in the bathroom, and many more. I proceeded to buy under the provisions to get it all fixed by closing. Closing is in a few days and NOTHING has been fixed, when confronted with a formal statement he evicted me from the property. I have 2 small babies and for those people at that company who I felt knew me very well all the sudden became the enemy in about 5 minutes. Sweet at first then saw what they ARE REALLY LIKE. Watch out for them, they are slick..

Read more...

Who Will STOP the Real Estate Cartel Known as The National Association of Realtors....

Realtor Do NOT have the Right to Simply REMOVE the Competition...
Check out this Article.

The Real Estate 'Cartel' strikes again
MLS smacks down Maverick Website

It was an antidote to Toronto's sprawling housing market: a simple website created by two self-described "computer geeks" to ease their first home search, and then help a city of frazzled buyers. That is until this week, when the Multiple Listings Service - the reigning king of online real estate listings in Canada - unleashed its lawyer on housing123.com and banished the new kids on the block.

"It was always this overhanging axe that was ready to fall," said Travis Fielding, the 31-year-old co-founder of the website, which allowed users to search MLS listings plotted on a Google map of local neighbourhoods.

After all, MLS has crushed upstarts before. Two Toronto-based sites, Realtysellers Ltd. and Realestateplus.ca, were shut down in the past two years after run-ins with the Canadian Real Estate Association, which owns the MLS trademark. Housing123.com is accused of using its information without permission.

But some industry watchers say MLS may be losing this online turf war, as what's happening in the United States may soon happen here: Sites such as Redfin, Zillow and Yahoo Real Estate now carry the lion's share of new listings, while MLS is losing ground.

They say the MLS business model - giving people only a taste of a house and directing them to an agent for more - won't stand up against competitors that will give you every detail about a house and its surroundings, including local crime stats, school reviews and previous purchase prices, along with 360 tours and a break on the commission.

"They're basically saying, 'You know what? People want to search listings themselves,' " says John Pasalis, founder of Realosophy.com, a website that dishes details about Toronto and Greater Toronto Area neighbourhoods. "The problem in Canada is we can't do this because the real-estate boards don't allow us."

The idea for housing123.com bloomed a couple of years ago after Mr. Fielding's friend and fellow software developer, Kevin Lai, became frustrated with his own home search. Sick of navigating MLS, and frustrated by an agent who missed good houses, Mr. Lai thought he could design a better system.

On his laptop, he basically created what is known as a "Google-map mash-up," which allows people to plot customized data (in this case, MLS listings) on top of a Google map application.
It worked so well that, just for kicks, he enlisted Mr. Fielding to help him take it to the public. It took about three weeks to work out the kinks, and they developed a way for the program to automatically add new listings. "On a scale of 10, it's probably like six," Mr. Lai, 29, says of the difficulty level. For their day jobs, he and Mr. Fielding design software for financial companies.
Since the site was launched 10 months ago, it averaged about 400 to 500 unique users per day, Mr. Fielding says.

Users appreciated its simplicity. House listings appeared as dots on a map of Toronto, which users clicked on to take them to the MLS listing. Houses were colour-coded by price so users could see which areas were pricey or affordable.

By contrast, MLS has no way to narrow a search to a neighbourhood. If you're looking for a Victorian in Kensington Market, you have to search in zone C-01, which covers Yonge to Dufferin, and Bloor to the Lakefront. (That includes the Annex, the waterfront, Kensington, Little Italy, Trinity-Bellwoods, University, the downtown core, and others.)

The search engine spits out hundreds of listings, and users are stuck flipping between MLS and Mapquest.

Still, the housing123.com founders knew it would just be a matter of time before MLS came knocking, because they were using listings that were the property of MLS.ca.
Last week, Mr. Lai received a letter from a CREA lawyer saying they had violated copyright laws. Remove the site, it said, or we'll sue.

"They were scraping data from our website," says Calvin Lindberg, president of CREA, which represents more than 94,000 brokers and agents. "It's something that we deal with on a regular basis. ... Obviously whenever we see it happening, we send a letter asking them to turn it off."
Since the site folded on June 15, dozens of users have voiced their dismay on a blog, urging the duo to keep going or seek legal advice.

One user wrote: "MLS is brutal and your site made finding the right place in the RIGHT location a breeze."

By the end of the summer, MLS.ca will have a map component, Mr. Lindberg says. Beyond that, he says, the site does not need to be improved. "We've created a very effective and efficient system that the consumers love."

Others disagree. One simply has to look south to see the potential for informative sites, Mr. Pasalis says. Those sites, however, have only been made possible through tough legal battles. In May, the U.S. National Association of Realtors settled its antitrust case with the Department of Justice, giving online realtors - which have been offering fees that are significantly lower than traditional realtor rates - full access to the MLS database.

Mr. Pasalis says the onus should be on Canada's Competition Bureau, not individual entrepreneurs, to fight to ensure fair competition is allowed in Canada too.
For now, Mr. Lai and Mr. Fielding say they are dreaming up new projects. "At least we helped a lot of people find their dream home," said Mr. Lai, who is now in the market for a downtown condo.

The pair say they may revive their site, but only to post properties from individual sellers or brokers - not MLS. "We can't afford the lawsuit, that's for sure," Mr. Fielding says.
Sadly, very few consumers appreciate that the MLS monopoly on publishing online real estate listings in Canada keeps listings fees double what they would be if open competition were permitted.

Link to Article Below


Who Gave the Realtors the RIGHT to Simply STOP Healthy Competition ? Why Do Realtors Get to have a Monopoly on the Real Estate Industry. The MLS Monopoly that Realtors have is Wrong, UnEthical, and SHOULD certainly be Illegal...

But REALTOR members are International so the Reign of the Real Estate Cartel Known as The National Association of Realtor is Far Reaching and Seemingly unStoppable in the Name of Real Estate Consumer Protection and a "Higher Standard" which as a Real Estate Broker Owner, Ex-Realtor Member I can Tell You Honestly.. that is a Flat OUT Lie. NAR is NOT interested in Protecting the Real Estate Consumer. the National Association of Realtors DOES not hold Realtors accountable for their actions that Really Do Hurt the Real Estate Consumer. Realtor member are in NO WAY of a Higher Standard than a State Licensed Real Estate Broker that is NOT a Realtor, I Say Broker because agents DO NOT get a Choice.

NAR says that being a Realtor is Voluntary but it is only Voluntary for the Broker Owner, if they are REALTORS, NAR members then the agent who signs with them has to be also. And if the Broker Owner wants to do business in their area with other Realtors - and look at what they call "their data" then the Broker Owner do not have much of a choice either. If they do not join they will be boycotted and will not get those exclusive members rights....

How Does an Association with Supposed Voluntary Members have the Right to Shut Down Other Peoples Websites.. Take away the Livlihood of those Who Cannot Afford to Fight them ?

Read more...

I Hate Realtors

a Post Entitled I hate Realtors...

Ok, I've had probably the worst luck with realtors. When we sold our last house, we used the "Mind Team" (name change). Turned out, they started backing out of agreements of rates for using them to buy as well. They tried to deny participation in our banks relocation service which gives us $2000 after selling or buying if we used them. The Mind Team daughter was our agent for buying. She never once found houses for us. Mrs SgtRedline found all of them, and in most cases called the agent to arrange showings.

That sucked, but I thought all that was behind us. Nope. We of course moved to Louisiana and needed to sell our house in Saratoga,NY again. We call our bank and get the relocation agent they recommend. I forget her name... mostly because of her fault... she never called us. We spoke one time. We called her numerous times after to which she never responded. WTF? You can't give some people money.

So we decided it wasn't worth the relocation bonus to have an agent we have to hunt down and go with one of the most well know agents of Saratoga. We'll call him "JustJack". Well known because his face is plastered everywhere.It starts out well.

He and his team were very responsive and during the showings they called us to give us all the details (we had already moved at this point). We finally have an offer we accept and suddenly the communications stop.

Ooookay. Seems like this is the point we need the details the most. Where did you go JustJack? We finally get the details that the inspection had been done and all that. But no word on a closing date. Mrs SgtRedline starts calling around trying to get details again.... to sum it up, the Office Manager for JustJack's Agency is actually arguing with her about what their responsibilities are.

Responsibilities such as: Letting us know the buying wanted something else. When the inspections would be done. etc. etc. etc. I mean really arguing. Thankfully our lawyer had the details, and decided it was best to just handle things from there for us.I mean.. if someone was about to pay me $15,000 for maybe a day or two's work over a 3 week span. I'd give them the best service I could. I guess when your mug is plastered around town like JustJack, you don't care about word-of-mouth referal. Maybe none of them care. I dunno.

Link I Found the Post is Below..

Read more...

Assist me in Telling on - Exposing the Realtors

I am the Real Estate Industry Whistleblower. The Realtors are Hurting You. Donate to Our Websites Exposing what the Realtors are Doing to You.
Click Here to Donate to This Blog.

Read more...

Did My Realtors Lie to Me??

First IndicatorI closed on my property during the first week of February. When I arrived at the closing my realtor handed me a slip of paper with contact information for a potential tenant. I was immediately worried; was one of the tenants moving??

My realtor said no, they just periodically got calls about it and the soon-to-be former owner wanted to pass the lead along to me. OK...I saw the seller's agent come out (who I had met before), and I asked him as well if any tenant was planning on moving. As he ran out the door he said "No, tenant B's been grumbling about moving, but that's not likely. She's lived there for 20 years after all. Bye!" OK...Second IndicatorEarlier this week my realtor forwarded me an email from the previous owner with yet another tenant lead. What the heck? Do they know something I don't? Keep in mind that DAYS before the closing Tenant B signed a lease agreement to satisfy my lender (she didn't have a written lease before that).

In it she pledged to stay for 12 months and pay month to month. If she/the agent/the owner knew she was planning to move and had her sign a lease anyway then that's obviously unethical at best.Really Starting to WorryRent from said tenant is due 2/15 and is late on 2/20 (today). So today I drove (flew) up there to give her a very formal, simple notice that her rent is late and requesting immediate payment. And to peek in the windows and make sure it looks occupied. I was already starting to put the pieces together and freak out a little.

Maybe It'll Be OK?Well, she had some mail in the mailbox, though I couldn't see through any windows. I did talk to the other tenant who said he's been seeing her every day except for the last couple. Then he mentioned that her live in boyfriend had moved out 3 weeks earlier. "She might have moved out too," he shrugged. I thanked him and left, feeling slightly better.

If she'd been there recently then she surely got my letter and knew where to send the rent. And unless she moved out YESTERDAY then she obviously still lived there...Wrong!

But I still wasn't settled, so I emailed the previous owner and politely explained the situation and asked if she had any other contact info for tenant B. She assured me that "that number" (to the adult entertainment hotline; see previous post) was correct and that the tenant would probably call me back. Then she said "She did tell me that she was moving back to Arkansas and would be out by February 15th. I thought [the realtor] would tell you this. He said it would probably work well for you as you wanted to go in and do some of the repairs."EXCUSE ME?!?! So I promptly forwarded the message to my realtor with the following message:

"What the hell? I can't believe you guys didn't tell me this. I knew it was fishy that you were passing along potential tenant contact info to me even before the closing. I specifically asked [the seller's agent] at the closing if any tenant was planning on moving, and he said no right to my face. Specifically I remember him saying "Oh, the lady in unit B's been grumbling about moving eventually, but that's not likely. She's lived there for 20 years, after all." This is absolutely unbelievable. And I know she was planning the move WELL before the closing, because Tenant A told me so today, and said the boyfriend went ahead and moved 3 weeks ago.

I can't believe this."Ok, so I was freaking out a little. He called me immediately and insisted that he didn't know anything about this. He went on about his morals and ethics and how he values helping his customers and would never withhold information. He said he'd emailed the seller's agent and instructed him to give me a full explanation of the timeline and where the break in communication happened. He suggested that the other agent hadn't known for sure if the tenant was moving or had found out after closing.

He said he felt bad about the situation, though, and offered to give me all kinds of advice on how to lease it out quickly, get referrals for needed repairs, and minimize my expenses. I was glad he was talking so much because I was crying a little and didn't want my voice to shake on the phone.So now there's nothing to be done, really. It's not as if I can or would sue them or fraud, even if they were lying.

I just have to immediately make the slew of repairs and upgrades needed on that unit and rent it out (which will cost thousands and thousands of dollars, and now I have to do them all at once). I called the adult entertainer/tenant back and requested that she give me a call.

Told her if I didn't hear from her within a day or two I was going to have to change the locks. She's probably back in Arkansas by now though. UPDATE: The tenant in question just called me back. She's been planning to move since before Christmas and told the previous owner so at that time. Which very coincidentally happens to be when that owner listed the property for sale.

Both women seem very sincere and genuine (previous owner and tenant), and I have no doubt the seller's agent knew about the situation. At the very least it would have been mentioned once my lender requested a signed lease from the tenant. She'd never had a lease, so they drew one up. They dated it February 2007, not 2008. I didn't even catch it, and neither did my lender. What kind of lease would appease a lender that expires one week after the closing?

Read more...

Do Realtors Lie - Do Consumers Get Justice ? EVER...

Buying or Selling a Home - realtor lied?

Expert: Todd Thornton - 6/23/2004

Question

Hi Todd!I contacted a real estate attorney .According to him the chances of winning a case against my realtor are very slim .First of all he thinks I could have measured the house myself before signing the papers and discoverd the problem .

Also ,he thinks that the realtor will most likely blame it on the seller and say the seller gave him the wrong numbers.The attorney suggest I may have a case against the seller , but ,again ,slim chances of a positive outcome (especially since the seller moved out of state).He said that I could write a letter of discontent to the realtor and his agency and ask for compensation(somwhere between $8,000-$10,000) but he doubted I would get it.

I still haven't given up on this.I still feel I was cheated.I find it strange that ,in case the seller gave the realtor the wrong numbers ,the realtor didn't verify them.Isn't he supposed to make sure the information is accurate?

If he's not ,does it mean I could get a realtor to list my house and tell him to list the house as 820 sqf instead of the 718 , and then hope somebody would fall for it?I am not sure what the realtor's responsability is.I read on the National Association of Realtors' website ,in Articol 2 of the "Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice" that : "Realtors shall avoid exaggeration,misrepresentation or concealment of pertinent facts relating to the property or the transaction."Also : "Realtors should only be obligated to discover and disclose adverse factors reasonably apparent to someone with expertise in those areas required by their real estate licensing authority."

The realtor responsible for the listing of this home claims to have 17 years of experience.That is a bit strange ,since the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce issued a licence for him only less than 16 years ago ,in the summer of 1988.Still ,with 15 years or more in real estate shouldn't he have noticed that the seller may have been lying to him (if that were the case) ? Or did he list the house without even looking at it? I am sorry to take so much of your time.

If there's no way for me to get compensated for those 62 square feet ,I would still push to get this realtor's licence suspended if possible.Where or whom can I contact to report this problem?Thank you again!Alin Mogosanu-------------------------Followup To Question - Hi Todd!Thank you for the fast response and for the advice.

I measured the house following your instructions and I ended up with 718 sqf .So,the realtor did exagerate the size of my house ,wheather on purpose or through negligence.

I will contact a Real Estate Attorney to see what I can do about it.Digging through my papers related to the buying of this home ,I also found a flier in which this realtor is advertising the house as having 2 bathrooms.Not true.The only way there could be a second bathroom is if that bathroom were entirely located in those fictitious 62 square feet.

I think this non existing bathroom and the exagerated square footage would prove either negligence ,not to call it stupidity, on the part of this realtor or that his marketing strategies are so agresive that he lies ,he will say whatever it takes to get people to look at his listed properties.

Thanks again Alin-------------------------Followup To Question - Hi Todd!I purchased a home in the summer of 2002 in Minneapolis ,Minnesota.It is a single family home and it was advertised as a 780 square feet house (foundation size 780 sqf and above ground square footage also 780 ).

However ,now,two years later I found out that from the City of Minneapolis property information web site that my house has a foundation size and above ground square footage of only 718.I know there's not much difference from 718 to 780 sqf ,but I am angry to see I have been lied to.

Is there anything I can do about this?I feel I've been cheated.Do you have any suggestions ?

Thank you AlinAnswer - Alin,It is possible that the city information is incorrect. I'd suggest you look at your appraisel. (request a copy from the bank if you didn't get one at closing)or you could measure the home youself.(which you'd need to do anyway to double check the figures) The measurement is length x width. For instance 26x30=780. There could be different ways of measuring depending on the area, but the most common for a single family would be measuring on the outside of the home. The real estate agent may not have lied intentionally. They could have measured the home incorrectly or taken the measurement from another source that was incorrect.

Assuming the 780 is correct, you could contact the agent and ask to be reinbursed for the difference in square footage.

The broker of the real estate office would be the contact person you'd need to call. You could figure out how much per square foot (from the appraisel)you'd need to multiple by (62) as to an appropriate amount to ask for. I'm not sure about Minnesota, but most agents are required to carry errors and ommission insurance which could cover this issue. (Assuming it was not intentionally done) If the error and ommission company won't pay, you could press the issue by filing a complaint with the real estate commission in your state.

FYI- Most real estate contracts state in the fine print the information given to you is not guaranteed as accurate.

That doesn't excuse the agent for giving you incorrect information. If the agent (or there broker) refused to work with you to rectify the situation, I'd suggest contacting a local attorney. In fact, you may want to go ahead and contact one now to explore your options.

Real estate law is state specific so they would have information on how judges or a jury have reacted to previous cases. Good luck and I hope everything works out.
Sincerely,Todd Thornton

Answer - Good luck and I hope everything works out for you.
It sounds like you will have a pretty good case.
Sincerely,Todd Thornton

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Buying-Selling-Home-1476/realtor-lied-1.htm

Read more...

Other Sites..

www.CrystalCox.com

www.BrokersZone.com

Real Estate Whistleblower

www.BrokersConsultations.com

SavvyBroker.com

Crystal L. Cox
Real Estate Whistleblower

Consumer Advocate in Real Estate

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP