Expose Realtors ~ Email me Your Story

NAR is NOT listening, State Realtor Associations is NOT Listening,
Law Makers - Attorneys - Judges are Not Listening..
State Real Estate Boards Are NOT Listening...

Title Companies, Lawyers, Good Realtors ...
Can DO Nothing.. so Email ME
Crystal L. Cox Real Estate Whistleblower
and Get your Story Heard...
Expose Realtors on our
Real Estate Industry Whistleblower...
Tell your Story...

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

NAR - the Ultimate Wolf in Sheeps Clothing

NAR - the Ultimate Wolf in Sheeps Clothing
Time to Hold NAR Accountable
to Those Code of Ethics
that are Simply Gibberish
they make Newbies Swear to
But have No Intention
or System in Place to
Make this REALLY Happen.

Time For the Truth About
the National Association of Realtors.

the National Association of Realtors is a Hoax.

NAR is NOT of a "Higher Standard" as they Claim to Be.

NAR does not Provide Consumer Protection in ANY way.

The National Association of Realtors NEEDS

you to REALLY buy into the Illusion that they
are the "Voice of Real Estate"
that way you will Simply not know that you can use
a Real Estate Broker that is NOT Part of the
Real Estate Cartel known as
National Association of Realtors.

And You Believe that an NAR Member Offers you
More Protection in your Real Estate Transaction
When In Fact that is a Flat Out Lie.

NAR is so Engrained in your Life that ALL of you Use
the Word "Realtor" for the WordS "Real Estate Agent"
though NAR tells me that is Illegal. Law Books Do it, you Do it
But NAR wants to STOP me from Doing it.

The National Association of Realtors
Violates Anti-Trust Laws, Violates Mortgage Laws,
Violates RESPA Laws, they pay Attorneys to
Advise members at the State Association Level
that is Information Biased on What NAR Needs
to be the Course of Action, to Keep NAR in Business.

Even to the Point of Convincing Members they
are doing something Illegal when they try and
benefit the Real Estate Consumer.

NAR Pushes State Real Estate Governing Agencies
to Make E and O insurance Mandated -
when in FACT this E and O insurance is What Enables
the Realtor to Legally Committ Fraud and
there is nothing you Can do unless you have
BIG Money and a WHOLE lot of Years to Fight.

The National Association of Realtor IS NOT the
Voice Of Real Estate. NO WAY.


There are Too Many Houses, Empty Houses, People Out of their Homes...


Builders and Realtors Unite to Lobby for laws that Force them in your life. Tons of foreclosures, and empty houses and they demand that money be let loose so that buyers can buy their new construction. Now the STANDARDS of that construction, well that is whole other topic for another day.

STOP overbuilding towns just to make developers and Realtors more money while at the same time directly attacking the Real Estate Consumer....

Builder Article... Below

"Builders Converge On Capitol Hill To Urge Housing Stimulus

January 8, 2009 - Less than 24 hours after members of the 111th Congress were sworn into office, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) launched an all-out effort to make housing a centerpiece of the massive economic stimulus package that lawmakers are expected to complete by mid-February.

More than 80 builders from across the country converged on Capitol Hill yesterday to meet with the congressional leadership and key members of the banking and tax writing committees to convey the message that a housing stimulus is urgently needed and that restoring demand for housing is the fastest and most effective way of reviving the economy.

The key ingredients to the recovery plan call for Congress to support enhancements to the home buyer tax credit, to provide below-market interest rates on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages and to continue foreclosure prevention measures such as those advocated by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman Sheila Bair.

Underscoring the urgency of the situation, in a briefing to builders before their meetings with lawmakers, NAHB Chairman Sandy Dunn said: “Our industry stands at a crossroads and our efforts here today are vital to the housing industry’s ability to weather this storm and come out the other side healthy and in a position to grow.”

“Congress must understand that housing is central to the economic crisis, that housing has led our nation out of past recessions and that it can do so again,” she added.

NAHB President and CEO Jerry Howard stressed that NAHB, as leader of the Fix Housing First coalition — which consists of more than 600 organizations, home building companies and manufacturers — was marching to Capitol Hill to show a united front.

“The message we are sending to Congress — there are no large builders, no small builders, no low-income builders, no suppliers and no manufacturers,” he said. “We’re all in this together and we are all focused on the stimulus package. We are talking to our members of Congress about a proposal crafted over the past several months that will fix both the supply and demand side of housing.”

“Over the next year, the stimulus plan will increase economic activity in every state as vacant homes are absorbed, households are able to relocate to new jobs, home values are stabilized and local property tax revenues return to their pre-recessionary levels,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe.

This year alone, Crowe said the plan would result in 200,000 additional new home sales, 1 million more existing home sales and a boost in expected housing starts from 649,000 to 908,000, on par with last year’s level.

In addition, the plan this year would create more than 539,000 jobs, generating $26 billion in wages and salaries, $21 billion in business income and $28 billion in federal, state and local tax revenues.

“The excess housing inventory in today’s market is the result of unprecedented foreclosures, not overbuilding. That’s why we support Sheila Bair’s foreclosure relief plan and any common-sense proposal to alleviate the foreclosure problem,” Howard said.

To underscore this point, single-family housing starts as of November 2008 were at 441,000, the lowest level on record and a decline of 76 percent from the peak in January of 2006. In addition, an increasing share of new single-family homes were being built under contract for the owner and not speculatively.

Under Bair’s plan, the federal government would provide $24 billion in loan guarantees that could help as many as 1.5 million home owners modify their existing mortgages and avoid foreclosure.

Putting the situation in starker terms, Crowe said that barring any significant federal action, 4 million strapped borrowers could lose their homes this year. “There are at least 1.5 million excess empty homes on the market today. That does not include homes people live in and want to sell,” he said.

In order to stabilize the marketplace and put a floor under declining home values, NAHB and the Fix Housing First coalition are calling on Congress to pass short-term, targeted incentives that spur demand and encourage Americans to buy homes.

Specifically, a temporary, expanded home buyer tax credit is needed to reduce excess inventory and encourage fence sitters to enter the market. The Fix Housing First legislative proposal calls on Congress to enact a stimulus plan that would reduces mortgage interest rates to as low as 2.99 percent on 30-year fixed-rate conventional loans purchased between Jan. 1, 2009 and June 30, 2009. The interest rate would be 3.99 percent for contracts that close between July 1, 2009 and Dec. 31, 2009.

At the same time, lawmakers need to make the current $7,500 home buyer tax credit much bigger and better, eliminating its current recapture provision and making it available to all purchasers. The coalition is calling for a credit amounting to 10 percent of the home’s price, capped at 3.5 percent of local FHA loan limits. This would range between $10,000 and $22,000.

The key is basing the credit amount on prices in each locality.

“Obviously, you don’t need a $22,000 credit in Bozeman, Mont. but a $22,000 credit will just get you into the marketplace in California,” said Howard.

The tax credit and interest rate buy-down are not new ideas, Howard added. “Congress enacted a similar housing solution in the mid-1970s when the nation was in recession. The plan led us out of recession then, and it can do it again.”

Bolstering the visits to Capitol Hill, more than 17,000 telephone calls and e-mails in support of the Fix Housing First proposal were received by the Congress from members of NAHB and the coalition.

To learn more about the coalition, go to http://www.fixhousingfirst.com/ . "
r

Read more...

Under The Influence of the Realtors - Not in YOUR best Interest.. no way..

Are Tax incentives that Realtors brag about Lobbying for Homeowners - Are they Really that Big Of A Deal? I think it is just a way to get more people into more homes, to make more money for the builders and the REALTORS but they ACT LIKE they rode in a white horse and are here to save the day for the homeown. Look Deeper... Buyers and Sellers - know that Realtors would not spend $100,000 a day to lobby to push something as small as YOUR TAX INCENTIVE, it is about their big commission, big developers and big home builders being able to get BIG MONEY..

The National Association of Realtors and the National Association of Homebuilders lobby for what is in their Best Interest, never let them tell you any different...

Article of Interest to Topic..

"Realtors, Homebuilders Score a Stimulus Coup

The National Association of Realtors and the National Association of Homebuilders of the U.S. scored a lobbying coup when an amendment was added this evening to the Senate stimulus bill that doubles the maximum size of the homebuyer tax credit from $7,500 to $15,000 on all purchases of principal residences.

The existing credit is scheduled to expire at the end of June, but the measure cosponsored by Sens. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., and Joseph Lieberman, ID-Conn., would extend the credit for one full year from the date the bill is enacted. It adds an estimated $19 billion to the stimulus package. The amendment was approved by the Senate without dissent after Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd D-Ct. signed onto the provision. "It's a recognition that housing has to be fixed if the economy is going to recover," said one industry lobbyist.

-- Peter H. Stone
http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2009/02/the-national-association-of-re.php

yes This is All about the Consuemer, NOT...
Crystal L. Cox Broker Owner....

One Interesting Comment on the Above Topic

"Here's a press release from the National Association of Home Builders from early January 2009 laying out just what they wanted. You can see it pretty much made it into legislation untouched in the US Senate.

And here's economics blog Calculated Risk explaining why juicing new homebuilding when there is already too much unused housing inventory is just plain wrong.

Lieberman and Isakson are increasing supply and demand and the only people who benefit will be homebuilders and people who use the program. Existing home owners will see the value of their home decrease because of increased supply of housing, but Lieberman and Isakson don't care about that, just pandering and handing out checks to a broken industry.

It's disgusting and 180 degrees wrong for the current economic crisis .."

http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2009/02/the-national-association-of-re.php

http://www.nahb.org/news_details.aspx?sectionID=0&newsID=8469

http://www.ajc.com/services/content/printedition/2009/01/08/obama.html

Read more...

from an NAR Lobbyist - How do you tell a good politician from a bad one?

My Words are in Blue...

Talk to him or her.
Yes that ought to be able to tell ya (wink - wink)

It seems like common sense, but who has the time to talk to the politicians when these elections come up? By the time a normal person has time to focus on the election, they are standing in the voting booth.
What is a Normal Person, is it the Voting, taxing paying, Real Estate Consumer public that are clueless about what laws and agendas NAR are pushing on them without their VOTE or their consent in any way.

As a REALTOR®, you have us to help inform your decision. Here are a few highlights of our Candidate Interview Program:
yes Good Thing we have the Relator to help "inform" our decision. Or does this mean push their decisions and agenda on us.

REALTORS® have a business interest in who wins an election. Your business can fail due to government action or inaction; you must take an interest or lose.
Hmmm... We Need to Push our Political Clout so that Realtors can stay in Business.

A thoughtful official who is at least willing to have a rational conversation about housing issues is always preferred.
What is a "Thoughtful Official" is that one whereby the Realtor can easily get their way?

Candidates are real people, often-real people who have not bought or sold a home in years. Politicians need REALTOR® expertise to make good decisions.
Hogwash Plain and Simple, People, Consumers - the Public needs to be informed and needs to be a Part of the decisions that affect them. Supposed Realtor Experts telling politicians what needs to be done while contributing to "their campaign" is as Anti-Consumer as it gets.

Politicians who raise money are heard, get votes, and are elected. If politicians do not have enough money to run an effective campaign, they lose.
In walks NAR - the Realtors to FUND their Candidate... there Agenda...

Politicians who have bad policies are still raising money and getting votes while a politician who can defend your business languishes because his message is not heard.

REALTORS® on MORe’s interview panel will ask questions about transfer taxes, onerous inspections, any issue that will affect your ability to do business.

REALTORS® on MORe’s interview panel will also ask questions that protect your client. Issues like privacy, the right to freely sell property without government interference, or just keeping the cost down (in the case of impact fees or transfer taxes)

REALTORS® do not buy votes by participating in elections. To the contrary, REALTORS® are participating in our democracy just as the founding fathers planned, just read the Federalist Papers to see how.

REALTORS® only support Republicans, or Democrats. REALTORS® across the nation support candidates across the political spectrum. The point that binds all REALTORS® together is their need for a healthy, open business climate.

REALTOR® issues are your issues. While we all have political interests in other areas, all

REALTORS® have an interest in keeping homeownership a thriving business.
Yes Realtors have an interest in staying in business and the Consumers DO NOT need a Realtor to Buy and Sell and if the Consumer uses a REALTOR they have, in FACT less protection in their real estate transaction then if they Did NOT use a Realtor. Thanks to NAR Forms, E and O insurance and a whole lot more...

REALTORS® are really the only group that advocates for homeowners. There is not other group that takes positions on Mortgage Interest Deduction, privacy, and Fourth Amendment Rights like REALTORS® do.

REALTORS®, be proud of your political program.
Yes Realtors Be Proud of this Consumer Stomping "political program" brought to you by NAR the Real Estate Cartel.

r

Read more...

Some tidbits Lobbyists Say Realtor need to know - I Say NAR needs to Sit Down and Shut up.. and Stop throwing their CLOUT around..

Fighting Fannie/Freddie’s Declining Markets Policies

MORe staff worked closely with NAR Financial Services Manager Jeff Lischer earlier this month urging an NAR response to several recent policies enacted by Fannie/Freddie. Policies which, when taken as a whole, are crippling our local marketplace. Today, NAR released the following statement in a Government Affairs Directors newsletter. MORe will continue to advocate on your behalf to roll back Fannie/Freddie policies to encourage a healthy housing market.

NAR RAISES CONCERNS ABOUT FANNIE AND FREDDIE POLICIES

On April 11, 2008,
NAR President Dick Gaylord wrote letters to Fannie Mae CEO Dan Mudd and Freddie Mac CEO Dick Syron to raise serious concerns about a range of Fannie and Freddie policies that, taken as a whole, are hurting the entire national economy, not just the housing and mortgage markets.

REALTORS® think there has been an overreaction by the GSEs and others in the housing finance industry that, even in the short term and certainly in the long term, will cause harm to the organizations involved by delaying recovery of the housing and mortgage markets.

Many small individual policy decisions designed to keep the enterprises financially sound, when layered one upon another, have created major impediments to healthy mortgage and housing markets.

The letters address three main areas of concern:

1. A wide variety of higher fees and other underwriting standards that make mortgages much less affordable.

2. Policies reducing maximum loan-to-value ratios (LTVs) by five percentage points for homes in declining markets.

3. Extremely tight underwriting standards for jumbo conforming loans authorized by the Economic Stimulus Act.

To view the NAR Letter to Fannie Mae, please click here: http://fedistrk.nsf/files/Letter_Fannie_Policies_ 04112008.pdf/ $FILE/Letter_Fannie_Policies_ 04112008.pdf

To view the NAR Letter to Freddie Mac, please click here:
http://fedistrk.nsf/files/Letter_Freddie_Policies_ 04112008.pdf/
$FILE/Letter_Freddie_Policies_ 04112008.pdf


Get NAR out of your Business, out of your Governing Bodies... Sell without an NAR member.. they are NOT of a Higher Standard, They are NOT really the voice of Real Estate. They are just bullys with billions.
r
In my Home State, I see that the Governing Affairs members from my local MLS are for ONE I know for sure is a Liar, committs fraud on consumers and does not have any accountability, the MLS - the local association protects him as he owns a C21 Franchise.. and this is the kind of guy that is out there supposedly getting things done for consumers or on behalf of any sense of morals and decency - Ethics or Standards of Practice of any Kind.


Read more...

NAR - You Do Not Get to Be the Voice of Real Estate...

r

Read more...

Joel Blackwell - Realtor RPAC information - Realtor Politics, Lobbying, NAR Politics, and other Tidbits..

The Association of Realtors Does Not Exist to Protect You.

Just Like any Publicly Traded Company REALTOR and all their associated Companies, Websites and Associates - are about making money, volumes and volumes of money. This is based on a whole lot of people and and a whole lot of income streams, however, the National Association of Realtors needs you to Keep on Using Realtors at the Local Level or the Whole Illusion Breaks Down. Realtors Use the Laws meant to Protect you against you.

Realtors lobby in large numbers, send mass amounts of letter and emails to to Government agencies such as the Department of Justice to STOP you from Selling by Owner Effectively, they Stop other Realtors from giving you discounts and helping you to win for a change, they lobby to keep banks out of real estate and for any little thing that will keep them in business and Will NOT benefit you or any REALTOR - ex-Realtor - Real Estate Broker or Real Estate Marketing Company.

The Folks, that try and help you to get a better deal with less drama are shut out, boycotted or getting policies and laws put into place by NAR and their troops that stop them.

When a Legislative Issue Comes Up that May Hurt Realtors but Benefit the Real Estate Consumer, they - the National Association of Realtors, the Local and State Association of Realtors put out the Call to Get all the REALTOR, NAR members to Fight for whatever it is that NAR wants, oftentimes NAR does this in the Name of what is Best for the Real Estate Consumer, however this NOT likely to Be True.

The Only Reason a Multi-Billion Dollar Company like NAR would Put out a Call would be to Save their Billion Dollar Income Stream from Shrinking.

rIf it was in the Best interst of the Consumer and this was Really What NAR was Fighing for the Real Estate Consumer then they would spend these millions that they spend on Lobbying on TV ads, Newspaper Ads and ways to Reach the Consumer and have them Stand up - Write Letters and emails with the Realtors, but that is NOT what the Call to Action is About... it is About NAR Staying in Control of You, and the Realtors on the Ground in Your Town want to Keep their jobs so they Stand Up and Do what NAR tells them to do.

How do They "Put out a Call" they send ALL Realtors Emails - Newletters - Association tell all the Members they have access to - they even give you form letters to email or send ( talk about anti-trust issues) and they Stand United to KNOCK you DOWN.

I have gotten emails that explain how the local association proudly went to Washington DC to fight to keep banks out of real estate, they fight to keep the MLS Data exclusively yours even though it is Your Data - it is Public Data Controlled by the Realtors... they lobby to keep it this way.

They sent us emails to fight against buyers rebates, and then newletters to scare us into NOT giving rebates and then they pushed for laws in our STATE to make Buyers Rebates even more legal then they were with the Previous Laws. And then a few months later when NAR loses its battle with the Department of Justice our State Laws Change and WOW Now all of the Sudden it is Legal for Me to DO what I want with my Paycheck.

Funny all these years they Kept Realtors from helping the Real Estate Consumer but Could not, or did not put a whole lot - if any effort into Checking MLS data for Quality Control, Stopping Mortgage Brokers from getting and giving kick back, stopping appraisers from having a copy of a signed by sell before their unbiased appraisal, Stoping Realtors from control markets - entering false data - stop fake sales .. so much goes on that they WILL not look at because NAR needs Realtors..

Why Not Lobby to Change the Laws that Are in Place that Really Do hurt the Consumer? Well There is No Money in that, STOP using Realtors.

Common Sense tells us that REALTORS are Advocates for their own industry, however, who has got your back in all this? Not Politicians.. I mean Realtors make BIG money. I sell One Large Ranch I make well over $100,000 dollars, I can afford - a REALTOR can afford to keep you in your place, and they use your own legislation and system of laws to do it.

They Know the Laws and Loopholes to get their way, they take classes on this stuff. They know the Protocol and they Know Just What to do in Order To get Things done to benefit them and their agenda which is making sure you believe that you need a Realtor when you Do Not.

They have meetings and trainings to teach REALTORS, and local association directors how to better Fight for What they want within the United States Justice System that is suppose to be there to protect you the Real Estate Consumer.

You are Not Taught how to protect yourself from the Realtors activities, there are no Consumer Classes to Train you on how to get things done on your own behalf.

Training Realtors to Fight - to Lobby to Stand
against Consumer Rights SHOULD be an Anti-Trust Violation.

I mean they all get together and conspire, they plan letters together - get their story strait - is this NOT violating public trust. Do you Know that the Realtors Unite against you like this, one issue over a million Realtors and You..

NAR and the Realtors in your Town Have more Political Power than you or ANY consumer rights advocate group could ever have and they are getting stronger. Realtors, some are quitting - New ones will join and through it all REALTOR will get bigger with online sites, stocks, Internet Marketing and Ad Revenue - selling books and classes - selling useless accreditations and making more money from YOU..
r


Search Terms for you to Learn More about All This
r
Personal Political Power, Realtor Association Executive Directors, Motivate Real Estate Agents to Write Letters, a Realtors Call to Action, Consulting Training Political Action Realtor, REALTORS® Political Action Committee (RPAC), RPAC Trustees: Provides political education training and fundraising programs for political action, Political Education Realtor, Political Fundraising Realtor, RPAC fundraising efforts, RPAC lobbyist
r
Search for more on these Topics and find out what REALTORS do to actively change laws and policies to work against you. Realtors work hard
every day to Keep you Out of the Loop but Paying their Bills.
l
The NAR is a HUGE Corporation and they have
a Constant Political Agenda to Keep REALTORS
in Business and to Keep you Down.

What Should You Do About this ?

STOP using Realtors, Complain to your Local Political Figure Heads, Email The Department of Justice, Email your Governor, Demand that there be More Protection in Real Estate for You, the People Who Matter Most in the Real Estate Transaction - The Real Estate Consumer.

rCrystal L. Cox Broker
I am YOUR Consumer Advocate in Real Estate.

r
rrConsumer Protection, Politics of Real Estate, Real Estate Consumer, Real Estate Rants, NAR Lobbyist, Realtor Lobbyist, Realtors Lobby, NAR Politics, RPAC, RPAC Trustee, Realtor Association Executive Directors, RPAC Lobbyist

r

Read more...

When NAR Lobbys - You, the real estate Consumer, You lose

April 29, 2009

" The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has dramatically increased its lobbying expenditures (and influence) in Washington in the wake of the bursting of the housing bubble. The first chart shows the lobbying expenditures of the NAR over the past five quarters. As you can see the NAR has greatly ramped up its lobbying expenditures in the past couple of quarters. The Q1′09 expenditures represent an increase of more than 82% over Q1′08 expenditures. In the past two quarters the NAR has spent $12.25 million on lobbying in Washington."

The purpose of the next two charts is to give you some perspective on the amount of money that NAR / the National Association of Realtors is spending on lobbying. The second chart shows how much that NAR spent per business day on lobbying during each of the past five quarters. During the past couple of quarters on average the NAR has spent roughly $100,000 per business day on lobbying expenditures. This is a mind numbing number.

$100,000 A Day ~ Anti-Consumer Lobbying in My Opinion.

This is YOUR money, you the Realtors in the Field - you the Real Estate Consumer and I am Highly Doubtful that it is really in ANY best interest of the Public.

So NAR can Seemingly justify their expenditures by saying it was (is) necessary to help educate public officals on the complex issues facing the nation during the housing crisis.

This is a ridiculous argument. Having educational meetings with policy makers is important, but it doesn’t need to be an expensive process. How do I know this? Because I was a corporate lobbyist in Washington years ago.

I had many meetings on Capitol Hill, and it just doesn’t cost much. How much does it cost to meet over a cup of coffee and exchange some ideas? My expenses were always small (a few bucks). As a former lobbyist it blows my mind to think of spending $100,000 every business day on expenses. It would be work just trying to spend the money.

As far as having the NAR educating our public officals, that scares me too. The forth chart (below) shows what the NAR was saying about housing during the past few years as the housing market was collapsing. I took the quotes directly from the titles of NAR press releases. Is this the organization that we want educating our public officals on how to fix the housing crisis?
.... it serves an important part in the American political process. The problem is the excessive amounts of money that have become commonplace in Washington lobbying circles. Excessive levels of lobbying expenditures serve to distort politics and not to advance the political process.

On a positive note the disclosure and reporting on lobbying has become better. The next step is to put controls in place on lobbying expenditures.


Note: The lobbying expenditures covered in this report are from U.S. Congress disclosures (and cover just the federal government). It should be noted that there are many state and local realtor associations in the U.S. that also lobby state and local officals. Those expenditures are not included in this report.


Data Source: U.S. Congress
Various National Association of Realtors Press Releases

Link to Source: Check It Out
http://chartingtheeconomy.com/?p=839
r
r
This is VERY, Very bad for the Real Estate Consumer. Realtors, NAR - lobbying your government why ? Sure must be on behalf of the Realtor. Why Not Just Get Back to Buyers Buying and Sellers Selling and Get Rid of all the Mumbo Jumbo.
r
Lobbying is a way to FORCE Realtors into Consumers lives on as many levels as they can. Money Talks, the Realtors Lobby about an Issue that you, the Real Estate Consumer don't even know about. So you don't get a vote, but you get to Pay for It... for the Realtors, and for the Politicians they lobby and "Contribute" to. In the Real World of Real Estate, you, the Real Estate Consumer - You Lose.
r

Read more...

Did lobbyist offer cash for regulator's vote?

A canceled campaign contribution from Idaho's most generous lobbying group is prompting calls to toughen the state bribery law.

A $500 contribution was promised in October to House Republican candidate Joan Cloonan of Garden City. But it was withdrawn hours later after Cloonan, who sits on the Department of Environmental Quality board, voted for a rule on septic systems that was opposed by the Idaho Association of Realtors.

Cloonan is a Ph.D. chemist, lawyer and former environmental officer at J.R. Simplot Co. During a break in the board's Oct. 8 meeting, Realtors lobbyist John Eaton told Cloonan he would give her a check at a fund-raiser later that day hosted by Gov. Butch Otter.

Eaton then testified against the septic rule, saying it would make it more expensive and in some cases impossible to build on some already platted lots. But Cloonan voted for the rule, which passed 6-1. The Realtors are now leading the effort at the Legislature to have the rule overturned on grounds that it is scientifically unfounded and a threat to property rights.

On Election Day, Eaton told Cloonan that her vote was a factor in withholding the $500. She responded in a Nov. 14 letter, writing that she was "disappointed and insulted" by his statement. She also complained to the secretary of state, attorney general and some legislators.

Eaton said he regrets the way he handled the incident but said he never tried trading money for a vote. The Realtors PAC gave more than $490,000 to candidates in 2008, about three times the total contributed by the next largest group.

Eaton is government affairs director for the 9,000-member association. A veteran lobbyist, he represents the Realtors exclusively. Earlier in his career, he lobbied for the Idaho Building Contractors Association. His testimony two weeks ago was part of the record that prompted lawmakers to cut Otter's revenue projection by $101 million last week.

Both the secretary of state and attorney general investigated Cloonan's account but found no legal recourse. "It's a very serious thing because we don't like people trying to buy votes," said Chief Deputy Secretary of State Tim Hurst.

"We regarded it as serious, and we examined the statutes," said Bill von Tagen, who heads the attorney general's intergovernmental law division. "We didn't find an unlawful act."

One of the legislators Cloonan spoke with, Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Eagle, wants to change that. He's drafting a bill to expand the bribery statute that makes it a felony to offer a public official a benefit in exchange for an official action.

"I don't see any difference between offering a benefit in exchange for a vote and withdrawing a benefit if you don't get the vote," said Labrador, who commends Cloonan for coming forward. "We have great public officials in the state of Idaho, and I don't think that one person should taint everybody else. I think that's evidenced by the way Joan reacted. She's a person of integrity."

Senate Assistant Minority Leader Kate Kelly, D-Boise, who advocates optional public financing of state campaigns, called Idaho's bribery law "pretty toothless."

Kelly said the Realtors' legislative strategy is typical of groups across the spectrum in a system where lawmakers rely heavily on PAC contributions to fund their campaigns. Trade associations, unions and other interest groups fund candidates that are friendly to their aims and attempt to unseat those who generally don't agree.

"It's ugly, but that's the way our law works," Kelly said. "In my experience, you vote for the Realtors' bill, they give money to your campaign. You vote against the Realtors' bill, they give your opponent money."

What's unusual about the Realtors dealings with Cloonan is that the group directly tied a vote to a contribution at the peak of an election campaign.

In Cloonan's case, the Realtors had already contributed $1,000 for the May primary. She still had the group's endorsement in the November general election but went without the additional $500 in her race against Democrat Grant Burgoyne, which she lost, 56 percent to 44 percent.
Cloonan said she became concerned she was being punished for her vote when she attended the fundraiser at Leku Ona, a Basque restaurant in Boise, after the DEQ board meeting on the evening of Oct. 8. Both Cloonan and Eaton were there, but they didn't speak, and she didn't get a check.

Eaton, however, did report a $500 contribution to Cloonan to the secretary of state, along with 39 other checks to legislative candidates dated Oct. 8. He now calls that a "regrettable accounting oversight on my part." He corrected the error after Cloonan pointed it out.
Eaton said he was not attempting to buy Cloonan's vote. He expected to lose at the DEQ board, but to win in the Legislature, where he has twice helped overturn rules requiring more space for septic drain fields.

On Election Night, as she watched returns at the GOP party at the DoubleTree Riverside, Cloonan confronted Eaton about the missing contribution.

"He says, 'Well, you didn't vote for me,'" Cloonan told the Idaho Statesman. "I didn't vote for him - that's the bottom line. I think it was a little test."

In the Nov. 14 letter to Eaton, Cloonan wrote: "The juxtaposition of the comment that there was a check for me with the vote and the subsequent failure to produce the check and then your barefaced statement that the vote was the reason for withholding the check is disturbing. It suggests there was a quid pro quo expectation tied to contributions. ... If not illegal, that is unethical and contributes to the low reputation of lobbyists in general."

Eaton responded to questions from the Statesman by e-mail. He wrote that he remembers "mentioning the septic issue as a concern" on Election Night. But he added that "there was never any expectation on my part of any kind of quid quo pro ... we do not tie campaign contributions to votes. Obviously, I wish I would have handled this better, and certainly I could have, but I have made every attempt to discuss the issue with Joan, and I have not been afforded that opportunity."

Cloonan said she called Eaton before the election to ask about the missing $500, which she reported as "pledged" on her finance report. Cloonan said Eaton did not reply to her message; Eaton says he didn't get it.

After Cloonan's Nov. 14 letter, she and Eaton corresponded by e-mail. But she refused Eaton's invitation to meet, writing, "Not sure what there is to talk about. I'm not running for office. I'm not looking for contributions. I'm not looking for explanations."

The Statesman contacted the president, past president and legislative committee chairman of the Realtors for comment. Eaton wrote that all three asked him to speak on the association's behalf.

Source Click Below..

Read more...

Foreclosure Laws to Benefit Realtors - Imagine Laws passing that are Realtor Friendly...

Just Things to Think About:

Jon Goodman Warns Don't Be Naive To New Foreclosure Laws

r

REALTOR - NAR, did they Lobby for Laws that helped them make money easier from Foreclosures while at the same time saying Buy Buy Buy? Did NAR lobby for laws to make short sales easier and did this happen way before the economic collapse you are witnessing. In my area Coldwell Banker and other are Realtors were saying it is a Good Time to Buy, yet somewhere - a Realtor representative was quite possibly lobbying and spending millions to do so in order to FORCE, suggest, Encourage the Enactment of Laws that would help Realtors make more money when these same Real Estate Consumers starting losing their homes (the ones where the Realtors said it was a Good time to Buy)
Realtor Has More Time To Sell, Laws enacted To benefited Realtors.
Also Not this Video Violates NAR trademark law in that it says Realtor in Place of Real Estate Agent at least once - Give Em' a Call Mary Newill.....

Helps Realtor With Foreclosure Sales.

This will “Help the Real Estate Broker Get Commissions”

Taking Away Owners Redemption Rights...

Real Estate Agents Jumping on the Foreclosure Bandwagon… You Loser
Just Food for Thought Folks...
r
Don't Listen To Me.. Just Look Deeper.

Much More Will Be Posted About The Kind of Money Spent by NAR to Lobby and for What.
There is much more in my blogs and sites, I encourage you, as a Real Estate Consumer to know more of what NAR is Pulling over ON you.

Read more...

Realtor Affilitions - Bad For Consumers.. It is a Good Time to Buy

Folks Get back to the basics.. Seller Want to Sell.. buyers want to buy.. Keep it Simple..

Do Realtor Affiliations Hurt Real Estate Consumers ?
r
I think Realtors Affiliations with All these Different Companies is
bad for the consumer and good for those at the top of the NAR food chain.
r

Read more...

Other Sites..

www.CrystalCox.com

www.BrokersZone.com

Real Estate Whistleblower

www.BrokersConsultations.com

SavvyBroker.com

Crystal L. Cox
Real Estate Whistleblower

Consumer Advocate in Real Estate

  © Free Blogger Templates Columnus by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP